![]() |
|
So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - Printable Version +- (https://wuthapn.com/forums) +-- Forum: WHAR LEWTS PLZ HALp (https://wuthapn.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: GINERAL FORUM (https://wuthapn.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? (/showthread.php?tid=3713) |
Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - Thorran - 09-28-2012 Firecrest Wrote:You have to hand it to them for the whole annual pass thing though. That was very shrewd. Kept subscription numbers up through the lull, gave them great press for the D3 release and lasted just long enough to make it so people were still in it when pandas came. It worked out really really well for them.Its gonna hurt them real bad when they lose at least 500k from it though, on top of whatever else they lose. Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - CAN - 09-28-2012 it makes me so happy to see many people start complaining about the awful rep system once they hit 90 Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - Firecrest - 10-04-2012 http://eu.blizzard.com/en-gb/company/press/pressreleases.html?id=6147208 Quote:ALLIANCE AND HORDE ARMIES GROW WITH LAUNCH OF MISTS OF PANDARIA™ Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but that seems fucking horrible. Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - Crazy Diana - 10-04-2012 The Burning Crusade - 2.4M First Day, 3.5M First Month Wrath of the Lich King - 2.8M First Day, 4M First Month Cataclysm - 3.3M First Day, 4.7M First Month so yeah, quite the disappointment if thats the result after a week Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - Firecrest - 10-04-2012 And TBC only had what, like 5m subscribers at launch? Kinda sad to go from half your base buying your expansion on the first day to only a quarter of it buying in the first week. Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - CAN - 10-04-2012 isn't china like 70% of the population anyways Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - myndor - 10-05-2012 alyse u sure bitch a lot about this to not care for it also most of the ppl replaying to u here are playing it Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - Firecrest - 10-05-2012 I find the status of a game that I dumped hundreds of days of play time into over the course of like seven years to be interesting. Sue me. I'm glad people here are playing it. More feedback for me to decide whether to drop the $60 on it or not. Not gonna lie though, a part of me really hopes that this "Catering to Casuals and Carebears" thing blows up in Blizzard's face enough that the next one or two expansions are actually good before they pull the plug on WoW and make us all play Titan. Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - CAN - 10-05-2012 i wouldn't say the current game is catered to casuals/carebears. if anything its probably closer to bc style of playing than it has been the last few expansions Re: So who's gonna be fucking pandas? - Firecrest - 10-05-2012 Really? I would love that. Maybe I should give it a try then. |