Rapescan

[jackslammer]

You can't have both Jack. Unless of course you want to subsidize the airline industry even more but then you'd be paying more taxes.

There has to be some way to let fliers decide what constitutes security rather than Michael Chertoff's security firm.

I think the problem is this word "let". Airlines are companies. That means profit first. You can't "let" them manage security and hope they don't cut corners. You have to -make- them do so. And the only organization that can make an airline do anything is the federal government.

I honestly don't think airliners would cut corners at the risk of having their fliers, plane, reputation, etc. all exploded by a terrorist and the government can still do their job of intelligence and surveillance without scanners. Israel, which is known for having the toughest and safest airports in the world, stops and investigates suspicious people nearby airports and on the road to the airport and uses no scanners in order to respect ahahahaha Muslims ahahahaha! :lol:

I'm done. Defending Ron Paul and Israel, something is wrong.